From Vaccine Mandates to Genocide - Part I
The Sordid History of Vaccine Mandates and its Inevitable Result
“I follow the science.”
This is the refrain repeated ad nauseum by the leaders of the free world.
In reality, it is just a nonsensical refrain that usually follows many of the most unscientific statements ever uttered.
This begs the question: why would those who claim to cling to science most insist that the arbitrary basis for their statements are scientific? Surely those that claim to worship science should be its greatest adherents. Why, time and again, are science’s greatest devotees also its greatest usurpers?
At many functions involving those being subjugated by vaccine mandates, I have encountered what may be described as a religious fervor. With chants such as “In G-d We Trust” and “Thank You G-d”, there seemed to be no room for an atheist among the thousands of people. Why is it, then, that when we contrast the worlds greatest vaccine shills, they always harbor staunch atheistic beliefs with a hatred for religion? Drs. Paul Offit, Stanley Plotkin[1], Peter Hotez[2] and Anthony Fauci[3], as well as arguably the most vocal advocates of vaccines, all show an unbelievable disdain for the practice of religion. How do we explain this chasm of beliefs and how it intersects with the vaccine agenda?
Inherent in atheism is the acceptance of responsibility of humans to control the destiny of the world. Atheists that claim “the science” led them to their beliefs, face an inexplicable enigma when faced with the realities of the world. A world left to its own devices is on a destructive path careening toward utter destruction. Famine, overpopulation, and enshrining everlasting happiness for the inhabitants of the world are only some of their problems. Relying solely on science is not a sustainable model. In an unbelievable composite of Greek Hedonism coupled with alleged responsibility to the planet, The Humanist Manifesto[4] was born. When first published in 1933, it was understood that not only did it supplant religion, but it was actually a religion onto itself. Humanism is a doctrine that promotes the belief that man is his own authority and is not accountable to any higher power. Among their “beliefs” are 1) There is no Creator: 2) There is no soul: 3) Prayer and worship are considered “old attitudes;” “new values” are suggested as a substitute: 4) Ethics and morality are situational: 5) Religion cultivates intolerant attitudes that unduly repress conduct: 6) Women have specific inherent rights to their bodies, and many other abominations.
Within a few short years, it became apparent that ideals such as those proposed by Humanism led to the atrocities committed by the Nazis. If any other belief system would be responsible for barbarism such as those perpetrated by the Nazis, it would be rightfully vilified and destroyed. But when the said religion is a non-religion, it only gets enshrined further. In 1973 the Humanists made a de facto admission that its earlier statement was far too optimistic and putting too much trust in humans and science is what enabled Nazism to rear its ugly head. Instead of accepting blame, or at least admitting defeat for trying to place humans in charge instead of G-d, it made the appalling step of simply revising its manifesto to The Humanist Manifesto II. As their Humanist manifesto concludes “mankind must learn to live together, or we will perish together.”
It must be underscored that those who embrace atheism face a paradoxical conundrum. On the one hand, they need to be true to the science. On the other hand, since they believe that the world’s future is in their hands, at times they need to purposely obfuscate the truth in order to protect the world.
Since in their mind perpetuating the world and truth telling cannot coincide, keeping the world in existence is far nobler than merely truth telling.
To give an extreme example: If the future of the world was solely left to your devices, the current population growth is unsustainable. If the government would somehow devise a means to keep it in check, they may lie about the methods utilized for the sake of warped ultraism. In the words of John D. Rockefeller on behalf of Commission on Population Growth; “By its very nature, population is a continuing concern and should receive continuing attention. [N]o generation needs to know the ultimate goal or the final means, only the direction in which they will be found.”
How does this all conflate with vaccines?
Subscribe now to find out and understand why Dr. Anthony Fauci was awarded the Humanist of the Year Award in Part II
[1] pp. 357-358
[2] “Potentially, such efforts might include combating creationism or other forms of pseudoscience as they become increasingly mainstreamed (and identified as real science) in the US. In this respect, there are several efforts to introduce legislation on this front in several states”
[3] “I think that there are a lot of things about organized religion that are unfortunate” “I look upon myself as a humanist. I have faith in the goodness of mankind”.
[4] Link to Humanist Manifestos I & II is intentionally omitted due to kefirah concerns. See Rama Y”D 246